<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 695 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s activity amounted to export of service. The impugned order rejecting the refund claim was set aside, and the matter was remanded for refund consideration. The court directed the refund adjudication within 60 days from the Tribunal&#039;s order receipt, instructing the appellant to appear before the adjudicating authority with a copy of the order for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 06:10:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 695 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s activity amounted to export of service. The impugned order rejecting the refund claim was set aside, and the matter was remanded for refund consideration. The court directed the refund adjudication within 60 days from the Tribunal&#039;s order receipt, instructing the appellant to appear before the adjudicating authority with a copy of the order for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>