<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365213</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in the final order dated 23.10.2017 as the issue raised regarding admissibility of disputed goods for Cenvat benefit was adequately addressed in the order. The application was found to lack merit and was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 06:10:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365213</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in the final order dated 23.10.2017 as the issue raised regarding admissibility of disputed goods for Cenvat benefit was adequately addressed in the order. The application was found to lack merit and was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>