<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 674 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Income Tax Officer erred in passing a final order under section 172(4) without issuing a draft assessment order as required by section 144C. The case was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for proper procedure, emphasizing the importance of following the statutory requirements. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the case concerning double non-taxation and the India-Singapore DTAA, remanding the cases for fresh assessment with instructions to consider all relevant issues. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the need for adherence to procedural requirements and consideration of substantive issues on remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2018 14:37:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 674 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Income Tax Officer erred in passing a final order under section 172(4) without issuing a draft assessment order as required by section 144C. The case was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for proper procedure, emphasizing the importance of following the statutory requirements. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the case concerning double non-taxation and the India-Singapore DTAA, remanding the cases for fresh assessment with instructions to consider all relevant issues. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the need for adherence to procedural requirements and consideration of substantive issues on remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>