<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 672 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365200</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, remanding the penalty issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with the law. The tribunal clarified that it had not commented on the merits of the issue and kept all contentions open for the AO to adjudicate on merits. The appeal was allowed on 9th August 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2018 14:37:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 672 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365200</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, remanding the penalty issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with the law. The tribunal clarified that it had not commented on the merits of the issue and kept all contentions open for the AO to adjudicate on merits. The appeal was allowed on 9th August 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>