<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 671 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 14A. It was held that no disallowance is warranted under Section 14A when no exempt income is earned during the relevant assessment year, in line with judicial precedents and the principle of consistency. The Tribunal emphasized that judicial interpretations prevail over administrative circulars in the application of tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2018 14:37:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 671 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 14A. It was held that no disallowance is warranted under Section 14A when no exempt income is earned during the relevant assessment year, in line with judicial precedents and the principle of consistency. The Tribunal emphasized that judicial interpretations prevail over administrative circulars in the application of tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>