<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 664 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT was not justified in invoking revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. It was found that there were no errors or prejudicial actions in the AO&#039;s assessment order regarding Sales Tax and TCS deductions. The Tribunal quashed the revision order by the CIT, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2018 14:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 664 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT was not justified in invoking revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. It was found that there were no errors or prejudicial actions in the AO&#039;s assessment order regarding Sales Tax and TCS deductions. The Tribunal quashed the revision order by the CIT, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>