<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 663 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 and restored the Assessing Officer&#039;s order under section 143(3), emphasizing correct application of law on weighted deduction under section 35(2AB. The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner misappreciated facts and law, leading to incorrect jurisdiction exercise. The appeal was allowed, focusing on factual correctness and legal requirements for deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2018 14:36:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 663 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 and restored the Assessing Officer&#039;s order under section 143(3), emphasizing correct application of law on weighted deduction under section 35(2AB. The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner misappreciated facts and law, leading to incorrect jurisdiction exercise. The appeal was allowed, focusing on factual correctness and legal requirements for deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>