<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 23 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14053</link>
    <description>The High Court of CALCUTTA ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned judgment and quashing the notice dated March 28, 1995, issued by the Income-tax Officer for reopening assessments. The court emphasized the necessity for the Income-tax Officer to have valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment due to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts, as per legal precedents and the facts of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 23 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14053</link>
      <description>The High Court of CALCUTTA ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned judgment and quashing the notice dated March 28, 1995, issued by the Income-tax Officer for reopening assessments. The court emphasized the necessity for the Income-tax Officer to have valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment due to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts, as per legal precedents and the facts of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>