https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274401 The judgment addressed compliance with Section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code, emphasizing the Magistrate's obligation to conduct an inquiry before issuing process, particularly when the accused reside outside the court's jurisdiction. It highlighted the mandatory nature of Section 202 and referenced relevant case law to support this requirement. The court also discussed the issue of territorial jurisdiction, concluding that the impugned order was unsustainable due to non-compliance with Section 202. The judgment emphasized the importance of following the amended provisions and remanded the matter for reconsideration by the Magistrate in accordance with the law, ultimately quashing the impugned order. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 12 Aug 2018 11:33:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274401 The judgment addressed compliance with Section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code, emphasizing the Magistrate's obligation to conduct an inquiry before issuing process, particularly when the accused reside outside the court's jurisdiction. It highlighted the mandatory nature of Section 202 and referenced relevant case law to support this requirement. The court also discussed the issue of territorial jurisdiction, concluding that the impugned order was unsustainable due to non-compliance with Section 202. The judgment emphasized the importance of following the amended provisions and remanded the matter for reconsideration by the Magistrate in accordance with the law, ultimately quashing the impugned order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274401