https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274403 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI rejected the appellant's refund claim of Rs. 7,86,018 under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the appellant's argument that the refund was a consequential relief not covered in previous show cause notices, the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' findings. The Tribunal emphasized that the refund claim was erroneous and inconsistent with the law, leading to the rejection of the appeal. en-us Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 12 Aug 2018 11:33:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274403 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI rejected the appellant's refund claim of Rs. 7,86,018 under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the appellant's argument that the refund was a consequential relief not covered in previous show cause notices, the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' findings. The Tribunal emphasized that the refund claim was erroneous and inconsistent with the law, leading to the rejection of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274403