https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274397 The Supreme Court of India held that the Custodian-General could not exercise revisional jurisdiction under Section 27 over an order of the Custodian that had already been approved by the Assistant Custodian-General acting as delegate under Section 55 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950. The statutory scheme confined revision to testing the legality or propriety of a Custodian's order and did not permit the authority, in substance, to review an order already validated through its delegate. The revision was therefore incompetent. Because the writ petitions also raised an alternative challenge to the original and consequential orders, the matter was remanded to the High Court for decision on those merits. en-us Thu, 14 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:33:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274397 The Supreme Court of India held that the Custodian-General could not exercise revisional jurisdiction under Section 27 over an order of the Custodian that had already been approved by the Assistant Custodian-General acting as delegate under Section 55 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950. The statutory scheme confined revision to testing the legality or propriety of a Custodian's order and did not permit the authority, in substance, to review an order already validated through its delegate. The revision was therefore incompetent. Because the writ petitions also raised an alternative challenge to the original and consequential orders, the matter was remanded to the High Court for decision on those merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274397