<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 125 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274396</link>
    <description>In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappraise the evidence but must give due weight to the trial judge&#039;s credibility findings, the presumption of innocence, the accused&#039;s entitlement to reasonable doubt, and the trial court&#039;s advantage in seeing witnesses. Where the trial court&#039;s view is reasonable, or the evidence supports two possible views, acquittal should not be disturbed. Here, the eyewitness evidence was found unreliable, the medical evidence did not support the manner of assault, and the identity of the assailants remained doubtful; the trial court had given cogent reasons for acquittal, so the High Court&#039;s reversal was set aside and the acquittal restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 11:28:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 125 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274396</link>
      <description>In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappraise the evidence but must give due weight to the trial judge&#039;s credibility findings, the presumption of innocence, the accused&#039;s entitlement to reasonable doubt, and the trial court&#039;s advantage in seeing witnesses. Where the trial court&#039;s view is reasonable, or the evidence supports two possible views, acquittal should not be disturbed. Here, the eyewitness evidence was found unreliable, the medical evidence did not support the manner of assault, and the identity of the assailants remained doubtful; the trial court had given cogent reasons for acquittal, so the High Court&#039;s reversal was set aside and the acquittal restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>