<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 659 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365187</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, permitting the bank guarantee commission as business expenditure based on the preponderance of probabilities and entries in the assessee&#039;s books. The issue of legal charges was remitted for verification, with additional grounds allowed for statistical purposes. The adhoc disallowance of expenses was rejected as the assessee did not press these grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 659 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365187</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, permitting the bank guarantee commission as business expenditure based on the preponderance of probabilities and entries in the assessee&#039;s books. The issue of legal charges was remitted for verification, with additional grounds allowed for statistical purposes. The adhoc disallowance of expenses was rejected as the assessee did not press these grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>