<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 655 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365183</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the penalty notice issued to the assessee was defective as it did not specify the charge of offense committed. Relying on the Karnataka High Court&#039;s decision, the tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:35:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 655 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365183</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the penalty notice issued to the assessee was defective as it did not specify the charge of offense committed. Relying on the Karnataka High Court&#039;s decision, the tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>