<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 639 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365167</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands of the appellant for differential duty, interest, and penalty. The appellant was advised to file a refund claim for the excess duty paid. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate calibration in determining duty payments and highlighted the appellant&#039;s compliance by paying excess duty despite discrepancies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 639 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365167</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands of the appellant for differential duty, interest, and penalty. The appellant was advised to file a refund claim for the excess duty paid. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate calibration in determining duty payments and highlighted the appellant&#039;s compliance by paying excess duty despite discrepancies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>