<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 634 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365162</link>
    <description>The appellant was held entitled to a cash refund of the Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by utilizing exemption notification 102/2007-CUS, despite the duty being debited in the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) pass book instead of paid in cash. The Member (Judicial) relied on the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in Allen Diesels India Pvt. Ltd. case, establishing that even if duty was debited in the DEPB scrip, refund should be granted in cash under the said notification. The Tribunal&#039;s previous judgment in Milton Laminates Ltd. case was distinguished, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed for a cash refund based on the settled legal position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 634 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365162</link>
      <description>The appellant was held entitled to a cash refund of the Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by utilizing exemption notification 102/2007-CUS, despite the duty being debited in the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) pass book instead of paid in cash. The Member (Judicial) relied on the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in Allen Diesels India Pvt. Ltd. case, establishing that even if duty was debited in the DEPB scrip, refund should be granted in cash under the said notification. The Tribunal&#039;s previous judgment in Milton Laminates Ltd. case was distinguished, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed for a cash refund based on the settled legal position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>