<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 633 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365161</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and confirming the acquittal of the respondent. The appellant failed to prove the dishonour of the cheque as required under the Negotiable Instruments Act, leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:23:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 633 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365161</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and confirming the acquittal of the respondent. The appellant failed to prove the dishonour of the cheque as required under the Negotiable Instruments Act, leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>