<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 631 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365159</link>
    <description>The court clarified that Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not apply to criminal proceedings against a company under insolvency. The court held that the moratorium provision only prohibits civil suits or similar proceedings, not criminal cases. Consequently, the court allowed the Writ Petition, quashed the order keeping the criminal revision in abeyance, and directed the criminal proceedings to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 631 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365159</link>
      <description>The court clarified that Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not apply to criminal proceedings against a company under insolvency. The court held that the moratorium provision only prohibits civil suits or similar proceedings, not criminal cases. Consequently, the court allowed the Writ Petition, quashed the order keeping the criminal revision in abeyance, and directed the criminal proceedings to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>