https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365158 The court clarified that the Metropolitan Magistrate in New Delhi had jurisdiction over criminal complaints regarding dishonored cheques, emphasizing the location of the drawee bank. The impact of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 was discussed, with subsequent changes in Section 142 and the addition of Section 142A addressing jurisdictional aspects. The interpretation validated transferring cases to courts with jurisdiction under the amended Section 142. The judgment allowed the petitions, setting aside transfer orders and reviving cases before the Metropolitan Magistrate in New Delhi for further proceedings. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:20:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365158 The court clarified that the Metropolitan Magistrate in New Delhi had jurisdiction over criminal complaints regarding dishonored cheques, emphasizing the location of the drawee bank. The impact of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 was discussed, with subsequent changes in Section 142 and the addition of Section 142A addressing jurisdictional aspects. The interpretation validated transferring cases to courts with jurisdiction under the amended Section 142. The judgment allowed the petitions, setting aside transfer orders and reviving cases before the Metropolitan Magistrate in New Delhi for further proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365158