<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 626 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties and ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the extended period demand for service tax on parking charges collected by the appellant as an &quot;Authorized Service Station&quot; from 2008-09 to 2011-12. The demand for duty for the normal period after May 1, 2011, was upheld. The appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:17:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 626 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties and ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the extended period demand for service tax on parking charges collected by the appellant as an &quot;Authorized Service Station&quot; from 2008-09 to 2011-12. The demand for duty for the normal period after May 1, 2011, was upheld. The appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>