<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 618 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365146</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of Revenue as the Cenvat benefit for outdoor catering services was disallowed based on the exclusion clause in the amended definition of input service. The matter regarding works contract services was remanded for further verification to determine if the services fell within the exclusion category under the definition of input service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:13:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 618 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365146</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of Revenue as the Cenvat benefit for outdoor catering services was disallowed based on the exclusion clause in the amended definition of input service. The matter regarding works contract services was remanded for further verification to determine if the services fell within the exclusion category under the definition of input service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>