<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 36 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14042</link>
    <description>Initiation of block assessment proceedings under s.158BD r/w s.158BC was challenged on the ground that, in a search of third parties, no books, documents, or assets belonging to the assessee were found, and hence no &quot;satisfaction&quot; could exist regarding undisclosed income. The HC held that absence of seized material belonging to the assessee does not bar action under s.158BD, as &quot;undisclosed income&quot; includes income evidenced by entries/documents not disclosed under the Act, and at the notice stage the AO need not reach firm or conclusive satisfaction. On facts indicating alleged accommodation/bogus transactions revealed in the search and disclosures, the initiation was neither without jurisdiction nor illegal; the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 36 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14042</link>
      <description>Initiation of block assessment proceedings under s.158BD r/w s.158BC was challenged on the ground that, in a search of third parties, no books, documents, or assets belonging to the assessee were found, and hence no &quot;satisfaction&quot; could exist regarding undisclosed income. The HC held that absence of seized material belonging to the assessee does not bar action under s.158BD, as &quot;undisclosed income&quot; includes income evidenced by entries/documents not disclosed under the Act, and at the notice stage the AO need not reach firm or conclusive satisfaction. On facts indicating alleged accommodation/bogus transactions revealed in the search and disclosures, the initiation was neither without jurisdiction nor illegal; the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>