https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365143 The court dismissed the writ application challenging a recovery notice for Central Value Added Tax (CENVAT) credit and penalty under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Central GST Act. The petitioner's contention of non-service of the original order for appeal was acknowledged, but the court held that an appeal could have been filed against the attested copy served. The court emphasized the petitioner's statutory remedy to appeal within 60 days of service and dismissed the application, granting liberty to seek remedies, including approaching the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) if necessary. en-us Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:11:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365143 The court dismissed the writ application challenging a recovery notice for Central Value Added Tax (CENVAT) credit and penalty under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Central GST Act. The petitioner's contention of non-service of the original order for appeal was acknowledged, but the court held that an appeal could have been filed against the attested copy served. The court emphasized the petitioner's statutory remedy to appeal within 60 days of service and dismissed the application, granting liberty to seek remedies, including approaching the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) if necessary. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365143