<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 609 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, reducing penalties and confirming demands based on the detailed analysis of each issue raised by the parties involved in the case. The judgment highlighted the importance of concrete evidence and legal support for demands related to CENVAT credit, process losses, and transportation discrepancies, emphasizing the need for substantiated claims in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 20:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 609 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, reducing penalties and confirming demands based on the detailed analysis of each issue raised by the parties involved in the case. The judgment highlighted the importance of concrete evidence and legal support for demands related to CENVAT credit, process losses, and transportation discrepancies, emphasizing the need for substantiated claims in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>