<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 608 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365136</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for reevaluation based on the original grounds cited in the show cause notice. The decision emphasized strict interpretation of the exemption notification and the burden of proof on the manufacturer to fulfill all conditions, directing compliance with the notification requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 608 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365136</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for reevaluation based on the original grounds cited in the show cause notice. The decision emphasized strict interpretation of the exemption notification and the burden of proof on the manufacturer to fulfill all conditions, directing compliance with the notification requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>