<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 607 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365135</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully appealed the refusal of CENVAT Credit on goods used for manufacturing final products. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deeming the appellant eligible for the credit and setting aside the original order. Emphasizing judicial precedent and proper interpretation of legal definitions, the decision favored the appellant, highlighting the significance of previous decisions in resolving disputes related to CENVAT Credit and capital goods in manufacturing processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 07:59:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 607 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365135</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully appealed the refusal of CENVAT Credit on goods used for manufacturing final products. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deeming the appellant eligible for the credit and setting aside the original order. Emphasizing judicial precedent and proper interpretation of legal definitions, the decision favored the appellant, highlighting the significance of previous decisions in resolving disputes related to CENVAT Credit and capital goods in manufacturing processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>