<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 604 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365132</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai. The Tribunal found that the erroneously claimed refund amount, which was subsequently repaid with interest, could be credited to the appellant&#039;s cenvat credit account. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was modified to set aside the penalty but allow the re-credit of the amount in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 07:58:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 604 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365132</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai. The Tribunal found that the erroneously claimed refund amount, which was subsequently repaid with interest, could be credited to the appellant&#039;s cenvat credit account. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was modified to set aside the penalty but allow the re-credit of the amount in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>