<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 351 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274389</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court held that the set off of carried forward unabsorbed depreciation should be governed by the provisions applicable for A.Y. 1997-98 to 1999-2000 rather than those for A.Y. 2003-04 and 2004-05.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 18:22:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 351 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274389</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court held that the set off of carried forward unabsorbed depreciation should be governed by the provisions applicable for A.Y. 1997-98 to 1999-2000 rather than those for A.Y. 2003-04 and 2004-05.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>