https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274383 Section 43 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 was upheld as a valid agrarian reform restriction because the statute disclosed clear policy guidance for regulating transfers of protected agricultural land and requiring prior sanction with premium payment. The Government Resolution dated 4.7.2008, which fixed premium by reference to jantri, was also sustained as a uniform and non-arbitrary method of assessment, with differentiated slabs and no successful challenge to the jantri itself. The Court further held that permission under Section 43 operates prospectively, so the relevant valuation date is the date of grant of permission, and the resolution applies to pending matters. en-us Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:41:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274383 Section 43 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 was upheld as a valid agrarian reform restriction because the statute disclosed clear policy guidance for regulating transfers of protected agricultural land and requiring prior sanction with premium payment. The Government Resolution dated 4.7.2008, which fixed premium by reference to jantri, was also sustained as a uniform and non-arbitrary method of assessment, with differentiated slabs and no successful challenge to the jantri itself. The Court further held that permission under Section 43 operates prospectively, so the relevant valuation date is the date of grant of permission, and the resolution applies to pending matters. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274383