<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 598 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365126</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeals challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the allowance of unabsorbed depreciation to be carried forward and adjusted after a lapse of assessment years. The Court relied on a previous decision in the case of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. to conclude that the issue had already been settled in favor of the Assessee, and thus, no new substantial question of law arose from the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:32:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 598 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365126</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeals challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the allowance of unabsorbed depreciation to be carried forward and adjusted after a lapse of assessment years. The Court relied on a previous decision in the case of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. to conclude that the issue had already been settled in favor of the Assessee, and thus, no new substantial question of law arose from the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>