<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1532 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274368</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 14A was held to be warranted in appropriate cases, but the quantum must be determined on a reasonable basis. Rule 8D was held to be prospective and therefore not applicable to the assessment year in question. The disallowance was not deleted; instead, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to recompute the section 14A disallowance afresh without applying Rule 8D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:16:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1532 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274368</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 14A was held to be warranted in appropriate cases, but the quantum must be determined on a reasonable basis. Rule 8D was held to be prospective and therefore not applicable to the assessment year in question. The disallowance was not deleted; instead, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to recompute the section 14A disallowance afresh without applying Rule 8D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>