<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for AY 2002-03 and 2003-04, treating deferred revenue expenditure as revenue expenditure. For AY 2009-10, the disallowance under Section 14A was deleted as no exempt income was earned. The claim under Section 37(1) was allowed, advances written-off issue was remitted back to the AO, and disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for late payment and short deduction of TDS was deleted. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for AY 2002-03 and 2003-04, treating deferred revenue expenditure as revenue expenditure. For AY 2009-10, the disallowance under Section 14A was deleted as no exempt income was earned. The claim under Section 37(1) was allowed, advances written-off issue was remitted back to the AO, and disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for late payment and short deduction of TDS was deleted. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>