<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 575 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365103</link>
    <description>Non-issuance of a draft assessment under the disputed reference procedure deprived the assessee of the statutory right to object and to have objections considered by the Dispute Resolution Panel; because the prior proceedings were void for violation of principles of natural justice and were set aside on remand nothing remained on record, so a fresh draft assessment should have been issued, failure of which vitiated the subsequent final assessment as without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 575 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365103</link>
      <description>Non-issuance of a draft assessment under the disputed reference procedure deprived the assessee of the statutory right to object and to have objections considered by the Dispute Resolution Panel; because the prior proceedings were void for violation of principles of natural justice and were set aside on remand nothing remained on record, so a fresh draft assessment should have been issued, failure of which vitiated the subsequent final assessment as without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>