<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proprietorship &quot;Capital Consultancy&quot; not a commercial entity under Finance Act 1944, clause 65(105)(zzb), no service tax liability.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40781</link>
    <description>Commercial concern or not - Merely because the appellant has referred in the his address as Capital consultancy, even if it is a proprietor ship firm, it is an individual - the applicant will not be commercial concern in view of clause 65(105) (zzb) of the Finance Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:06:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:06:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proprietorship &quot;Capital Consultancy&quot; not a commercial entity under Finance Act 1944, clause 65(105)(zzb), no service tax liability.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40781</link>
      <description>Commercial concern or not - Merely because the appellant has referred in the his address as Capital consultancy, even if it is a proprietor ship firm, it is an individual - the applicant will not be commercial concern in view of clause 65(105) (zzb) of the Finance Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:06:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>