<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 558 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by M/s Sanghvi Travels regarding the demand and penalty on service tax for rent-a-cab services. The Tribunal favored the revenue on the merit of the issue but ruled in favor of the appellant on the limitation period. As a result, the demand beyond the limitation period was set aside, and the appeal was partly allowed. The judgment was delivered on 11.07.2018 by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 558 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by M/s Sanghvi Travels regarding the demand and penalty on service tax for rent-a-cab services. The Tribunal favored the revenue on the merit of the issue but ruled in favor of the appellant on the limitation period. As a result, the demand beyond the limitation period was set aside, and the appeal was partly allowed. The judgment was delivered on 11.07.2018 by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>