<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 546 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the confirmation of demand, interest, and penalty under the Compounded Levy Scheme for non-payment of Central Excise duty on closed machines. The decision was based on the provisions of Notification 17/07 and relevant case law interpretations, emphasizing that duty liability does not arise for machines declared unused after opting for the concession under the scheme. The Tribunal differentiated between non-use and actual removal of machinery, highlighting the requirement of production for duty levy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:05:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 546 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the confirmation of demand, interest, and penalty under the Compounded Levy Scheme for non-payment of Central Excise duty on closed machines. The decision was based on the provisions of Notification 17/07 and relevant case law interpretations, emphasizing that duty liability does not arise for machines declared unused after opting for the concession under the scheme. The Tribunal differentiated between non-use and actual removal of machinery, highlighting the requirement of production for duty levy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>