<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 537 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365065</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s non-contested demand of Rs. 8,687 and set aside the remaining demand, interest, and penalty. The appeal was partly allowed based on the finding that since no goods were produced using the cylinders, the duty demand on the value charged in the debit note for printing cylinders not used in manufacturing goods for M/s ICI Ltd could not be justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:05:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 537 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365065</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s non-contested demand of Rs. 8,687 and set aside the remaining demand, interest, and penalty. The appeal was partly allowed based on the finding that since no goods were produced using the cylinders, the duty demand on the value charged in the debit note for printing cylinders not used in manufacturing goods for M/s ICI Ltd could not be justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>