<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 536 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365064</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD partly allowed the appeal concerning the admissibility of Cenvat credit for various services availed by the appellant. The Tribunal held that if services were used for the company and expenses were borne by the appellant, credit was admissible. Subscription to business associations was considered an admissible input service. Other services like online information access, training, and advertisement were included in the definition of input services without further nexus establishment required. The matter of car and aircraft hiring was remanded for verification, while credit for other services was allowed, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:05:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 536 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365064</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD partly allowed the appeal concerning the admissibility of Cenvat credit for various services availed by the appellant. The Tribunal held that if services were used for the company and expenses were borne by the appellant, credit was admissible. Subscription to business associations was considered an admissible input service. Other services like online information access, training, and advertisement were included in the definition of input services without further nexus establishment required. The matter of car and aircraft hiring was remanded for verification, while credit for other services was allowed, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>