https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365061 The Tribunal refrained from ruling on the appellant's entitlement to CENVAT credit for construction services due to procedural deficiencies regarding the limitation issue. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for a decision on limitation, emphasizing the need for a determination on this aspect before addressing the substantive credit entitlement. The Tribunal highlighted the absence of a finding on limitation and stressed the importance of resolving this matter before reaching a conclusion on the appellant's claim for credit. en-us Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:05:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365061 The Tribunal refrained from ruling on the appellant's entitlement to CENVAT credit for construction services due to procedural deficiencies regarding the limitation issue. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for a decision on limitation, emphasizing the need for a determination on this aspect before addressing the substantive credit entitlement. The Tribunal highlighted the absence of a finding on limitation and stressed the importance of resolving this matter before reaching a conclusion on the appellant's claim for credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365061