<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1382 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274352</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s direction to allow carry forward and set-off of unabsorbed depreciation from A.Y. 1997-98 to 1998-99 against profits of A.Y. 2008-09. It analyzed the interpretation of Section 32(2) pre-amendment by the Finance Act, 2001, and considered the impact of the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the Department&#039;s SLP. The Court&#039;s decision demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of tax law complexities and judicial reasoning in applying legal provisions to the case at hand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 21:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1382 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274352</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s direction to allow carry forward and set-off of unabsorbed depreciation from A.Y. 1997-98 to 1998-99 against profits of A.Y. 2008-09. It analyzed the interpretation of Section 32(2) pre-amendment by the Finance Act, 2001, and considered the impact of the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the Department&#039;s SLP. The Court&#039;s decision demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of tax law complexities and judicial reasoning in applying legal provisions to the case at hand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>