<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1351 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274355</link>
    <description>Revenue challenged deletion of additions relating to alleged unexplained investment in properties based on diaries seized during search, and an addition for household expenses. The Gujarat HC noted that both issues had already been considered in the assessee&#039;s own connected appeals and, without recording separate reasons, dismissed this tax appeal as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 21:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1351 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274355</link>
      <description>Revenue challenged deletion of additions relating to alleged unexplained investment in properties based on diaries seized during search, and an addition for household expenses. The Gujarat HC noted that both issues had already been considered in the assessee&#039;s own connected appeals and, without recording separate reasons, dismissed this tax appeal as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>