<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 503 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appeal maintainable, affirming its jurisdiction under section 146 of the Customs Act, 1962, and emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles. It set aside the prohibition order due to the Commissioner&#039;s overreach in exercising prohibitory power under Regulation 15, directing the respondent to notify the Commissioner accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 503 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appeal maintainable, affirming its jurisdiction under section 146 of the Customs Act, 1962, and emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles. It set aside the prohibition order due to the Commissioner&#039;s overreach in exercising prohibitory power under Regulation 15, directing the respondent to notify the Commissioner accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>