<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 500 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision to demand the erroneously refunded amount of Special Additional Duty, along with interest and penalty, due to the submission of a forged certificate by the importer to fulfill the unjust enrichment condition for the refund. The appeals challenging the recoverability of the demand, interest, and penalty were dismissed, affirming the sustainability of the impugned orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 500 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision to demand the erroneously refunded amount of Special Additional Duty, along with interest and penalty, due to the submission of a forged certificate by the importer to fulfill the unjust enrichment condition for the refund. The appeals challenging the recoverability of the demand, interest, and penalty were dismissed, affirming the sustainability of the impugned orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>