<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 496 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365024</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the lower authorities to quantify the Service Tax and penalty payable by the appellants for the period from 18.04.2006 to 31.12.2006. The Tribunal held that any eligibility for CENVAT Credit and refund should be determined by the jurisdictional authorities following the relevant procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:28:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 496 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365024</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the lower authorities to quantify the Service Tax and penalty payable by the appellants for the period from 18.04.2006 to 31.12.2006. The Tribunal held that any eligibility for CENVAT Credit and refund should be determined by the jurisdictional authorities following the relevant procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>