https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365016 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand and interest against the appellant for outdoor catering services, rejecting their defense of non-reimbursement by service recipients. While the penalties under sections 70, 77, and 78 were upheld, the penalty under section 76 was set aside. The judgment emphasized the liability of service providers regardless of reimbursement and the importance of fulfilling tax obligations even without reimbursement from service recipients. en-us Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:27:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365016 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand and interest against the appellant for outdoor catering services, rejecting their defense of non-reimbursement by service recipients. While the penalties under sections 70, 77, and 78 were upheld, the penalty under section 76 was set aside. The judgment emphasized the liability of service providers regardless of reimbursement and the importance of fulfilling tax obligations even without reimbursement from service recipients. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365016