<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 478 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the interest and penalty demands on wrongly availed Cenvat Credit due to the lack of fraudulent intent by the appellants. The immediate reversal of credit, non-utilization, and sufficient account balance indicated compliance and negated penalty imposition. The decision was in line with legal precedents, emphasizing the absence of malafide intent and the appellants&#039; prompt corrective actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 478 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the interest and penalty demands on wrongly availed Cenvat Credit due to the lack of fraudulent intent by the appellants. The immediate reversal of credit, non-utilization, and sufficient account balance indicated compliance and negated penalty imposition. The decision was in line with legal precedents, emphasizing the absence of malafide intent and the appellants&#039; prompt corrective actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>