<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 475 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant due to insufficient evidence supporting the demand under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasized the necessity of establishing CENVAT credit availed on inputs used in exempted goods before imposing such demands, stressing the importance of maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods to avoid disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:27:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 475 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant due to insufficient evidence supporting the demand under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasized the necessity of establishing CENVAT credit availed on inputs used in exempted goods before imposing such demands, stressing the importance of maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods to avoid disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>