<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 467 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364995</link>
    <description>Notification No. 20/2007-CE required a manufacturer, where all goods were exempt, to first utilise the full Cenvat credit available at the end of the month and pay only the balance duty in cash. The assessee instead paid duty through PLA and then sought refund, which was treated as contrary to the mandatory sequence prescribed by the exemption scheme. The cited clarification and precedent supported the view that refund of duty attributable to unutilised credit was not admissible. The refund claim was therefore rejected and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:26:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 467 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364995</link>
      <description>Notification No. 20/2007-CE required a manufacturer, where all goods were exempt, to first utilise the full Cenvat credit available at the end of the month and pay only the balance duty in cash. The assessee instead paid duty through PLA and then sought refund, which was treated as contrary to the mandatory sequence prescribed by the exemption scheme. The cited clarification and precedent supported the view that refund of duty attributable to unutilised credit was not admissible. The refund claim was therefore rejected and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>