https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364992 The appeal challenged the Order in Appeal upholding duty demand on goods clandestinely removed. The Member (Judicial) noted the undisputed clandestine removal and directed a remand to the adjudicating authority for recalculating the demand after granting the cum duty benefit to the appellant. The Member concluded that the appellant was entitled to the cum duty benefit, in line with the Tribunal's previous ruling, leading to a disposal of the appeal through remand for reevaluation of the demand with the cum duty benefit considered. en-us Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:26:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364992 The appeal challenged the Order in Appeal upholding duty demand on goods clandestinely removed. The Member (Judicial) noted the undisputed clandestine removal and directed a remand to the adjudicating authority for recalculating the demand after granting the cum duty benefit to the appellant. The Member concluded that the appellant was entitled to the cum duty benefit, in line with the Tribunal's previous ruling, leading to a disposal of the appeal through remand for reevaluation of the demand with the cum duty benefit considered. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364992