https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364982 Lead dross arising during manufacture was disputed on classification and excisability, with central excise duty, interest and penalty confirmed under the Central Excise Act. The demand could not be sustained because binding judicial precedent had already held the contrary view unacceptable, and the controlling High Court decision, read with the Supreme Court ruling referred to therein, governed the issue. The demand and consequential penalties were therefore unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:26:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364982 Lead dross arising during manufacture was disputed on classification and excisability, with central excise duty, interest and penalty confirmed under the Central Excise Act. The demand could not be sustained because binding judicial precedent had already held the contrary view unacceptable, and the controlling High Court decision, read with the Supreme Court ruling referred to therein, governed the issue. The demand and consequential penalties were therefore unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364982